A
SUMMER SNOW JOB
Creating jobs for the
American workforce is one thing. Doing a
job on the American people is quite another.
Mitt Romney and the GOP like to conflate the two.
The
central theme of Governor Romney’s presidential campaign is that as a
businessman he knows how to create jobs and that as President he will get the
economy humming again and put America back to work.
Really? How’s he going to do this? Dramatically reduce government spending, cut
taxes on the so-called job creators (aka the super wealthy) and reduce the stifling
regulatory burden on businesses: the same, tired troika of the GOP political
arsenal that has been around for decades.
Even though experience has demonstrated over and over again that this is
patent nonsense and the worst kind of political flimflam, the GOP keeps
trotting it out every election cycle.
Why? Because it works.
If the GOP really wanted
to help put people back to work, it would have passed some form of the
President’s job bill that he submitted to Congress early in the year. It has a number of features supposedly dear
to the heart of Republicans. It includes,
for example, tax credits to encourage businesses to hire unemployed veterans;
preventing up to 280,000 teacher layoffs; and keeping first responders
including firefighters and police officers on the job. It also calls for modernizing at least 35,000
public schools across the country, rebuilding the nation’s infrastructure:
roads, railways, and airports, all of which would be a rich source of jobs.
But, when
your number one aim is to make sure the President is not re-elected to a second
term, creating jobs can wait. Even for a
President who has cut taxes seven times for small businesses, the real job
creators, and one-third of whose stimulus package consisted of tax cuts, and
submitted a jobs bill that includes tax credits for job creators. First things
first.
Sound too
cynical? I don’t think so.A case in point: There’s a transportation bill currently languishing in the House that would put millions of unemployed construction workers back on the job. The Senate passed a bill, with Republican support, but the tea-soaked House has held the bill hostage by linking to it “three controversial non-transportation issues: expansion of offshore and artic oil exploration, approval of the Keystone pipeline and relaxation of restrictions on use of coal ash,” as reported by the June 14 Washington Post.
Besides the jobs issue, another
arrow in the GOP’s campaign quiver is the charge that President Obama has
driven government spending through the roof.
That isn’t true, of course, and recent statistics bear that out. The fact is that the Republican controlled
House has rejected virtually everything the President has sent to the Hill,
except the Affordable Care Act which was passed over strong GOP opposition when
the Democrats led the House. And, now
that may well be overturned by the GOP-controlled Supreme Court.
The irony is that if the
GOP had cooperated even minimally with the President, his spending record might
be a credible issue to run against. But,
if you cut the wings off a bird and then complain that it can’t fly, you damage
your case.
This thing could get
curiouser and curiouser during the summer and into the fall, so stay tuned. Meantime, go easy on the tea – it damages the
brain -- and watch out for snow.
Gerald E. Lavey
Hi Jerry,
ReplyDeleteGreat stuff here. I'll tell you, Jerry, the anti-Obama business has me scratching my head. I shot the breeze with a couple of teachers at the end of the school year. We drifted into the dangerous waters of politics. One claimed that Obama's agenda was all about creating a one-government new world order. The other had visited the Holocaust museum in DC and came away thinking that this president shares many of Hitler's traits during the 1920s. You can't make this stuff up. Why can't the Democrats take charge of the narrative? You'd think the American people would be pissed off at the Republicans for their do-nothing negativism. And Mitt Romney as a worthy opponent? Seriously?
Hi, Kevin:
ReplyDeleteIt's frightening, as well as puzzling. A great deal of racism is mixed in, of course, although no one wants to admit that and they go crazy when I bring it up. Thanks, as always, for your interesting insightful feedback.
Jerry